:: Construction of a bilinear symmetric form in orthogonal vector space :: by Eugeniusz Kusak, Wojciech Leo\'nczuk and Micha{\l} Muzalewski :: :: Received November 23, 1989 :: Copyright (c) 1990-2012 Association of Mizar Users begin reconsider X = {0} as non empty set ; reconsider o = 0 as Element of X by TARSKI:def_1; deffunc H1( Element of X, Element of X) -> Element of X = o; consider md being BinOp of X such that Lm1: for x, y being Element of X holds md . (x,y) = H1(x,y) from BINOP_1:sch_4(); Lm2: now__::_thesis:_for_F_being_Field_ex_mo_being_Relation_of_X_st_ for_x_being_set_holds_ (_x_in_mo_iff_(_x_in_[:X,X:]_&_ex_a,_b_being_Element_of_X_st_ (_x_=_[a,b]_&_b_=_o_)_)_) defpred S1[ set ] means ex a, b being Element of X st ( $1 = [a,b] & b = o ); set CV = [:X,X:]; let F be Field; ::_thesis: ex mo being Relation of X st for x being set holds ( x in mo iff ( x in [:X,X:] & ex a, b being Element of X st ( x = [a,b] & b = o ) ) ) consider mo being set such that A1: for x being set holds ( x in mo iff ( x in [:X,X:] & S1[x] ) ) from XBOOLE_0:sch_1(); mo c= [:X,X:] proof let x be set ; :: according toTARSKI:def_3 ::_thesis: ( not x in mo or x in [:X,X:] ) thus ( not x in mo or x in [:X,X:] ) by A1; ::_thesis: verum end; then reconsider mo = mo as Relation of X ; take mo = mo; ::_thesis: for x being set holds ( x in mo iff ( x in [:X,X:] & ex a, b being Element of X st ( x = [a,b] & b = o ) ) ) thus for x being set holds ( x in mo iff ( x in [:X,X:] & ex a, b being Element of X st ( x = [a,b] & b = o ) ) ) by A1; ::_thesis: verum end; Lm3: for F being Field for mF being Function of [: the carrier of F,X:],X for mo being Relation of X holds ( SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) is Abelian & SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) is add-associative & SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) is right_zeroed & SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) is right_complementable ) proofend; Lm4: now__::_thesis:_for_F_being_Field for_mF_being_Function_of_[:_the_carrier_of_F,X:],X_st_(_for_a_being_Element_of_F for_x_being_Element_of_X_holds_mF_._[a,x]_=_o_)_holds_ for_mo_being_Relation_of_X for_MPS_being_non_empty_right_complementable_Abelian_add-associative_right_zeroed_SymStr_over_F_st_MPS_=_SymStr(#_X,md,o,mF,mo_#)_holds_ (_MPS_is_vector-distributive_&_MPS_is_scalar-distributive_&_MPS_is_scalar-associative_&_MPS_is_scalar-unital_) let F be Field; ::_thesis: for mF being Function of [: the carrier of F,X:],X st ( for a being Element of F for x being Element of X holds mF . [a,x] = o ) holds for mo being Relation of X for MPS being non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F st MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) holds ( MPS is vector-distributive & MPS is scalar-distributive & MPS is scalar-associative & MPS is scalar-unital ) let mF be Function of [: the carrier of F,X:],X; ::_thesis: ( ( for a being Element of F for x being Element of X holds mF . [a,x] = o ) implies for mo being Relation of X for MPS being non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F st MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) holds ( MPS is vector-distributive & MPS is scalar-distributive & MPS is scalar-associative & MPS is scalar-unital ) ) assume A1: for a being Element of F for x being Element of X holds mF . [a,x] = o ; ::_thesis: for mo being Relation of X for MPS being non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F st MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) holds ( MPS is vector-distributive & MPS is scalar-distributive & MPS is scalar-associative & MPS is scalar-unital ) let mo be Relation of X; ::_thesis: for MPS being non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F st MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) holds ( MPS is vector-distributive & MPS is scalar-distributive & MPS is scalar-associative & MPS is scalar-unital ) let MPS be non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F; ::_thesis: ( MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) implies ( MPS is vector-distributive & MPS is scalar-distributive & MPS is scalar-associative & MPS is scalar-unital ) ) assume A2: MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) ; ::_thesis: ( MPS is vector-distributive & MPS is scalar-distributive & MPS is scalar-associative & MPS is scalar-unital ) for x, y being Element of F for v, w being Element of MPS holds ( x * (v + w) = (x * v) + (x * w) & (x + y) * v = (x * v) + (y * v) & (x * y) * v = x * (y * v) & (1_ F) * v = v ) proof let x, y be Element of F; ::_thesis: for v, w being Element of MPS holds ( x * (v + w) = (x * v) + (x * w) & (x + y) * v = (x * v) + (y * v) & (x * y) * v = x * (y * v) & (1_ F) * v = v ) let v, w be Element of MPS; ::_thesis: ( x * (v + w) = (x * v) + (x * w) & (x + y) * v = (x * v) + (y * v) & (x * y) * v = x * (y * v) & (1_ F) * v = v ) A3: (x * y) * v = x * (y * v) proof set z = x * y; A4: (x * y) * v = mF . ((x * y),v) by A2, VECTSP_1:def_12; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; A5: (x * y) * v = o by A1, A2, A4; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; A6: mF . (y,v) = o by A1, A2; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; y * v = o by A2, A6, VECTSP_1:def_12; then x * (y * v) = mF . (x,o) by A2, VECTSP_1:def_12; hence (x * y) * v = x * (y * v) by A1, A5; ::_thesis: verum end; A7: x * (v + w) = (x * v) + (x * w) proof reconsider v = v, w = w as Element of MPS ; A8: o = 0. MPS by A2, STRUCT_0:def_6; reconsider v = v, w = w as Element of X by A2; A9: md . (v,w) = o by Lm1; reconsider v = v, w = w as Element of MPS ; x * (v + w) = mF . (x,o) by A2, A9, VECTSP_1:def_12; then A10: x * (v + w) = o by A1; reconsider w = w as Element of MPS ; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; A11: mF . (x,v) = o by A1; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; A12: mF . (x,w) = o by A1; reconsider w = w as Element of MPS ; A13: x * w = o by A2, A12, VECTSP_1:def_12; x * v = o by A2, A11, VECTSP_1:def_12; hence x * (v + w) = (x * v) + (x * w) by A10, A13, A8, RLVECT_1:4; ::_thesis: verum end; A14: (x + y) * v = (x * v) + (y * v) proof set z = x + y; A15: (x + y) * v = mF . ((x + y),v) by A2, VECTSP_1:def_12; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; A16: (x + y) * v = o by A1, A2, A15; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; A17: mF . (x,v) = o by A1, A2; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; A18: x * v = o by A2, A17, VECTSP_1:def_12; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; A19: mF . (y,v) = o by A1, A2; A20: o = 0. MPS by A2, STRUCT_0:def_6; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; y * v = o by A2, A19, VECTSP_1:def_12; hence (x + y) * v = (x * v) + (y * v) by A16, A18, A20, RLVECT_1:4; ::_thesis: verum end; (1_ F) * v = v proof set one1 = 1_ F; A21: (1_ F) * v = mF . ((1_ F),v) by A2, VECTSP_1:def_12; reconsider v = v as Element of MPS ; mF . ((1_ F),v) = o by A1, A2; hence (1_ F) * v = v by A2, A21, TARSKI:def_1; ::_thesis: verum end; hence ( x * (v + w) = (x * v) + (x * w) & (x + y) * v = (x * v) + (y * v) & (x * y) * v = x * (y * v) & (1_ F) * v = v ) by A7, A14, A3; ::_thesis: verum end; hence ( MPS is vector-distributive & MPS is scalar-distributive & MPS is scalar-associative & MPS is scalar-unital ) by VECTSP_1:def_14, VECTSP_1:def_15, VECTSP_1:def_16, VECTSP_1:def_17; ::_thesis: verum end; Lm5: now__::_thesis:_for_F_being_Field for_mF_being_Function_of_[:_the_carrier_of_F,X:],X for_mo_being_Relation_of_X_st_(_for_x_being_set_holds_ (_x_in_mo_iff_(_x_in_[:X,X:]_&_ex_a,_b_being_Element_of_X_st_ (_x_=_[a,b]_&_b_=_o_)_)_)_)_holds_ for_MPS_being_non_empty_right_complementable_Abelian_add-associative_right_zeroed_SymStr_over_F_st_MPS_=_SymStr(#_X,md,o,mF,mo_#)_holds_ (_(_for_a,_b,_c,_d_being_Element_of_MPS_st_a_<>_0._MPS_&_b_<>_0._MPS_&_c_<>_0._MPS_&_d_<>_0._MPS_holds_ ex_p_being_Element_of_MPS_st_ (_not_a__|__&_not_b__|__&_not_c__|__&_not_d__|__)_)_&_(_for_a,_b_being_Element_of_MPS for_l_being_Element_of_F_st_b__|__holds_ b__|__)_&_(_for_a,_b,_c_being_Element_of_MPS_st_a__|__&_a__|__holds_ a__|__)_&_(_for_a,_b,_x_being_Element_of_MPS_st_not_a__|__holds_ ex_k_being_Element_of_F_st_a__|__)_&_(_for_a,_b,_c_being_Element_of_MPS_st_b_-_c__|__&_c_-_a__|__holds_ a_-_b__|__)_) set CV = [:X,X:]; let F be Field; ::_thesis: for mF being Function of [: the carrier of F,X:],X for mo being Relation of X st ( for x being set holds ( x in mo iff ( x in [:X,X:] & ex a, b being Element of X st ( x = [a,b] & b = o ) ) ) ) holds for MPS being non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F st MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) holds ( ( for a, b, c, d being Element of MPS st a <> 0. MPS & b <> 0. MPS & c <> 0. MPS & d <> 0. MPS holds ex p being Element of MPS st ( not a _|_ & not b _|_ & not c _|_ & not d _|_ ) ) & ( for a, b being Element of MPS for l being Element of F st b _|_ holds b _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st a _|_ & a _|_ holds a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, x being Element of MPS st not a _|_ holds ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ ) ) let mF be Function of [: the carrier of F,X:],X; ::_thesis: for mo being Relation of X st ( for x being set holds ( x in mo iff ( x in [:X,X:] & ex a, b being Element of X st ( x = [a,b] & b = o ) ) ) ) holds for MPS being non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F st MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) holds ( ( for a, b, c, d being Element of MPS st a <> 0. MPS & b <> 0. MPS & c <> 0. MPS & d <> 0. MPS holds ex p being Element of MPS st ( not a _|_ & not b _|_ & not c _|_ & not d _|_ ) ) & ( for a, b being Element of MPS for l being Element of F st b _|_ holds b _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st a _|_ & a _|_ holds a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, x being Element of MPS st not a _|_ holds ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ ) ) let mo be Relation of X; ::_thesis: ( ( for x being set holds ( x in mo iff ( x in [:X,X:] & ex a, b being Element of X st ( x = [a,b] & b = o ) ) ) ) implies for MPS being non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F st MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) holds ( ( for a, b, c, d being Element of MPS st a <> 0. MPS & b <> 0. MPS & c <> 0. MPS & d <> 0. MPS holds ex p being Element of MPS st ( not a _|_ & not b _|_ & not c _|_ & not d _|_ ) ) & ( for a, b being Element of MPS for l being Element of F st b _|_ holds b _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st a _|_ & a _|_ holds a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, x being Element of MPS st not a _|_ holds ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ ) ) ) assume A1: for x being set holds ( x in mo iff ( x in [:X,X:] & ex a, b being Element of X st ( x = [a,b] & b = o ) ) ) ; ::_thesis: for MPS being non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F st MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) holds ( ( for a, b, c, d being Element of MPS st a <> 0. MPS & b <> 0. MPS & c <> 0. MPS & d <> 0. MPS holds ex p being Element of MPS st ( not a _|_ & not b _|_ & not c _|_ & not d _|_ ) ) & ( for a, b being Element of MPS for l being Element of F st b _|_ holds b _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st a _|_ & a _|_ holds a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, x being Element of MPS st not a _|_ holds ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ ) ) let MPS be non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F; ::_thesis: ( MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) implies ( ( for a, b, c, d being Element of MPS st a <> 0. MPS & b <> 0. MPS & c <> 0. MPS & d <> 0. MPS holds ex p being Element of MPS st ( not a _|_ & not b _|_ & not c _|_ & not d _|_ ) ) & ( for a, b being Element of MPS for l being Element of F st b _|_ holds b _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st a _|_ & a _|_ holds a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, x being Element of MPS st not a _|_ holds ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ ) ) ) assume A2: MPS = SymStr(# X,md,o,mF,mo #) ; ::_thesis: ( ( for a, b, c, d being Element of MPS st a <> 0. MPS & b <> 0. MPS & c <> 0. MPS & d <> 0. MPS holds ex p being Element of MPS st ( not a _|_ & not b _|_ & not c _|_ & not d _|_ ) ) & ( for a, b being Element of MPS for l being Element of F st b _|_ holds b _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st a _|_ & a _|_ holds a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, x being Element of MPS st not a _|_ holds ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ ) ) 0. MPS = o by A2, TARSKI:def_1; hence for a, b, c, d being Element of MPS st a <> 0. MPS & b <> 0. MPS & c <> 0. MPS & d <> 0. MPS holds ex p being Element of MPS st ( not a _|_ & not b _|_ & not c _|_ & not d _|_ ) by A2, TARSKI:def_1; ::_thesis: ( ( for a, b being Element of MPS for l being Element of F st b _|_ holds b _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st a _|_ & a _|_ holds a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, x being Element of MPS st not a _|_ holds ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ ) ) A3: for a, b being Element of MPS holds ( b _|_ iff ( [a,b] in [:X,X:] & ex c, d being Element of X st ( [a,b] = [c,d] & d = o ) ) ) proof let a, b be Element of MPS; ::_thesis: ( b _|_ iff ( [a,b] in [:X,X:] & ex c, d being Element of X st ( [a,b] = [c,d] & d = o ) ) ) ( b _|_ iff [a,b] in mo ) by A2, ORDERS_2:def_5; hence ( b _|_ iff ( [a,b] in [:X,X:] & ex c, d being Element of X st ( [a,b] = [c,d] & d = o ) ) ) by A1; ::_thesis: verum end; A4: for a, b being Element of MPS holds ( b _|_ iff b = o ) proof let a, b be Element of MPS; ::_thesis: ( b _|_ iff b = o ) A5: ( b = o implies b _|_ ) proof consider c, d being Element of MPS such that A6: ( c = a & d = b ) ; assume A7: b = o ; ::_thesis: b _|_ [a,b] = [c,d] by A6; hence b _|_ by A2, A3, A7; ::_thesis: verum end; ( b _|_ implies b = o ) proof assume b _|_ ; ::_thesis: b = o then ex c, d being Element of X st ( [a,b] = [c,d] & d = o ) by A3; hence b = o by XTUPLE_0:1; ::_thesis: verum end; hence ( b _|_ iff b = o ) by A5; ::_thesis: verum end; thus for a, b being Element of MPS for l being Element of F st b _|_ holds b _|_ ::_thesis: ( ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st a _|_ & a _|_ holds a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, x being Element of MPS st not a _|_ holds ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ ) ) proof let a, b be Element of MPS; ::_thesis: for l being Element of F st b _|_ holds b _|_ let l be Element of F; ::_thesis: ( b _|_ implies b _|_ ) assume b _|_ ; ::_thesis: b _|_ then b = o by A4; hence b _|_ by A4; ::_thesis: verum end; thus for a, b, c being Element of MPS st a _|_ & a _|_ holds a _|_ ::_thesis: ( ( for a, b, x being Element of MPS st not a _|_ holds ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ ) ) proof let a, b, c be Element of MPS; ::_thesis: ( a _|_ & a _|_ implies a _|_ ) assume that A8: a _|_ and a _|_ ; ::_thesis: a _|_ a = o by A4, A8; hence a _|_ by A4; ::_thesis: verum end; thus for a, b, x being Element of MPS st not a _|_ holds ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ::_thesis: for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ proof let a, b, x be Element of MPS; ::_thesis: ( not a _|_ implies ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) assume A9: not a _|_ ; ::_thesis: ex k being Element of F st a _|_ assume for k being Element of F holds not a _|_ ; ::_thesis: contradiction a <> o by A4, A9; hence contradiction by A2, TARSKI:def_1; ::_thesis: verum end; thus for a, b, c being Element of MPS st b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ holds a - b _|_ ::_thesis: verum proof let a, b, c be Element of MPS; ::_thesis: ( b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ implies a - b _|_ ) assume that b - c _|_ and c - a _|_ ; ::_thesis: a - b _|_ assume not a - b _|_ ; ::_thesis: contradiction then a - b <> o by A4; hence contradiction by A2, TARSKI:def_1; ::_thesis: verum end; end; :: 2. ORTHOGONAL VECTOR SPACE definition let F be Field; let IT be non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F; attrIT is OrtSp-like means :Def1: :: ORTSP_1:def 1 for a, b, c, d, x being Element of IT for l being Element of F holds ( ( a <> 0. IT & b <> 0. IT & c <> 0. IT & d <> 0. IT implies ex p being Element of IT st ( not a _|_ & not b _|_ & not c _|_ & not d _|_ ) ) & ( b _|_ implies b _|_ ) & ( a _|_ & a _|_ implies a _|_ ) & ( not a _|_ implies ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ implies a - b _|_ ) ); end; :: deftheorem Def1 defines OrtSp-like ORTSP_1:def_1_:_ for F being Field for IT being non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F holds ( IT is OrtSp-like iff for a, b, c, d, x being Element of IT for l being Element of F holds ( ( a <> 0. IT & b <> 0. IT & c <> 0. IT & d <> 0. IT implies ex p being Element of IT st ( not a _|_ & not b _|_ & not c _|_ & not d _|_ ) ) & ( b _|_ implies b _|_ ) & ( a _|_ & a _|_ implies a _|_ ) & ( not a _|_ implies ex k being Element of F st a _|_ ) & ( b - c _|_ & c - a _|_ implies a - b _|_ ) ) ); registration let F be Field; cluster non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed vector-distributive scalar-distributive scalar-associative scalar-unital strict OrtSp-like for SymStr over F; existence ex b1 being non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed SymStr over F st ( b1 is OrtSp-like & b1 is vector-distributive & b1 is scalar-distributive & b1 is scalar-associative & b1 is scalar-unital & b1 is strict ) proofend; end; definition let F be Field; mode OrtSp of F is non empty right_complementable Abelian add-associative right_zeroed vector-distributive scalar-distributive scalar-associative scalar-unital OrtSp-like SymStr over F; end; theorem Th1: :: ORTSP_1:1 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for a being Element of S holds a _|_ proofend; theorem Th2: :: ORTSP_1:2 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for a, b being Element of S st b _|_ holds a _|_ proofend; theorem Th3: :: ORTSP_1:3 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for a, b, c being Element of S st not b _|_ & b _|_ holds not b _|_ proofend; theorem Th4: :: ORTSP_1:4 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, c being Element of S st not a _|_ & a _|_ holds not a _|_ proofend; theorem Th5: :: ORTSP_1:5 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a being Element of S for l being Element of F st not a _|_ & not l = 0. F holds ( not a _|_ & not l * a _|_ ) proofend; theorem Th6: :: ORTSP_1:6 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for a, b being Element of S st b _|_ holds b _|_ proofend; theorem Th7: :: ORTSP_1:7 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for a, b, d, c being Element of S st d _|_ & d _|_ holds d _|_ proofend; theorem Th8: :: ORTSP_1:8 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x being Element of S for k, l being Element of F st not a _|_ & a _|_ & a _|_ holds k = l proofend; theorem Th9: :: ORTSP_1:9 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for a, b being Element of S st a _|_ & b _|_ holds a - b _|_ proofend; theorem :: ORTSP_1:10 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F st (1_ F) + (1_ F) <> 0. F & ex a being Element of S st a <> 0. S holds ex b being Element of S st not b _|_ proofend; :: 5. ORTHOGONAL PROJECTION definition let F be Field; let S be OrtSp of F; let a, b, x be Element of S; assume A1: not a _|_ ; func ProJ (a,b,x) -> Element of F means :Def2: :: ORTSP_1:def 2 for l being Element of F st a _|_ holds it = l; existence ex b1 being Element of F st for l being Element of F st a _|_ holds b1 = l proofend; uniqueness for b1, b2 being Element of F st ( for l being Element of F st a _|_ holds b1 = l ) & ( for l being Element of F st a _|_ holds b2 = l ) holds b1 = b2 proofend; end; :: deftheorem Def2 defines ProJ ORTSP_1:def_2_:_ for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for a, b, x being Element of S st not a _|_ holds for b6 being Element of F holds ( b6 = ProJ (a,b,x) iff for l being Element of F st a _|_ holds b6 = l ); theorem Th11: :: ORTSP_1:11 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x being Element of S st not a _|_ holds a _|_ proofend; theorem Th12: :: ORTSP_1:12 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x being Element of S for l being Element of F st not a _|_ holds ProJ (a,b,(l * x)) = l * (ProJ (a,b,x)) proofend; theorem Th13: :: ORTSP_1:13 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x, y being Element of S st not a _|_ holds ProJ (a,b,(x + y)) = (ProJ (a,b,x)) + (ProJ (a,b,y)) proofend; theorem :: ORTSP_1:14 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x being Element of S for l being Element of F st not a _|_ & l <> 0. F holds ProJ (a,(l * b),x) = (l ") * (ProJ (a,b,x)) proofend; theorem Th15: :: ORTSP_1:15 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x being Element of S for l being Element of F st not a _|_ & l <> 0. F holds ProJ ((l * a),b,x) = ProJ (a,b,x) proofend; theorem :: ORTSP_1:16 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, p, c being Element of S st not a _|_ & a _|_ holds ( ProJ (a,(b + p),c) = ProJ (a,b,c) & ProJ (a,b,(c + p)) = ProJ (a,b,c) ) proofend; theorem :: ORTSP_1:17 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, p, c being Element of S st not a _|_ & b _|_ & c _|_ holds ProJ ((a + p),b,c) = ProJ (a,b,c) proofend; theorem Th18: :: ORTSP_1:18 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, c being Element of S st not a _|_ & a _|_ holds ProJ (a,b,c) = 1_ F proofend; theorem Th19: :: ORTSP_1:19 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a being Element of S st not a _|_ holds ProJ (a,b,b) = 1_ F proofend; theorem Th20: :: ORTSP_1:20 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x being Element of S st not a _|_ holds ( a _|_ iff ProJ (a,b,x) = 0. F ) proofend; theorem Th21: :: ORTSP_1:21 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, q, p being Element of S st not a _|_ & not a _|_ holds (ProJ (a,b,p)) * ((ProJ (a,b,q)) ") = ProJ (a,q,p) proofend; theorem Th22: :: ORTSP_1:22 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, c being Element of S st not a _|_ & not a _|_ holds ProJ (a,b,c) = (ProJ (a,c,b)) " proofend; theorem Th23: :: ORTSP_1:23 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, c being Element of S st not a _|_ & c + a _|_ holds ProJ (a,b,c) = - (ProJ (c,b,a)) proofend; theorem Th24: :: ORTSP_1:24 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for a, b, c being Element of S st not b _|_ & not b _|_ holds ProJ (c,b,a) = ((ProJ (b,a,c)) ") * (ProJ (a,b,c)) proofend; theorem Th25: :: ORTSP_1:25 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for p, a, x, q being Element of S st not a _|_ & not x _|_ & not a _|_ & not x _|_ holds (ProJ (a,q,p)) * (ProJ (p,a,x)) = (ProJ (q,a,x)) * (ProJ (x,q,p)) proofend; theorem Th26: :: ORTSP_1:26 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for p, a, x, q, b, y being Element of S st not a _|_ & not x _|_ & not a _|_ & not x _|_ & not a _|_ holds ((ProJ (a,b,p)) * (ProJ (p,a,x))) * (ProJ (x,p,y)) = ((ProJ (a,b,q)) * (ProJ (q,a,x))) * (ProJ (x,q,y)) proofend; theorem Th27: :: ORTSP_1:27 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for a, p, x, y being Element of S st not p _|_ & not p _|_ & not p _|_ holds (ProJ (p,a,x)) * (ProJ (x,p,y)) = (ProJ (p,a,y)) * (ProJ (y,p,x)) proofend; :: 6. BILINEAR SYMMETRIC FORM definition let F be Field; let S be OrtSp of F; let x, y, a, b be Element of S; assume A1: not a _|_ ; func PProJ (a,b,x,y) -> Element of F means :Def3: :: ORTSP_1:def 3 for q being Element of S st not a _|_ & not x _|_ holds it = ((ProJ (a,b,q)) * (ProJ (q,a,x))) * (ProJ (x,q,y)) if ex p being Element of S st ( not a _|_ & not x _|_ ) otherwise it = 0. F; existence ( ( ex p being Element of S st ( not a _|_ & not x _|_ ) implies ex b1 being Element of F st for q being Element of S st not a _|_ & not x _|_ holds b1 = ((ProJ (a,b,q)) * (ProJ (q,a,x))) * (ProJ (x,q,y)) ) & ( ( for p being Element of S holds ( a _|_ or x _|_ ) ) implies ex b1 being Element of F st b1 = 0. F ) ) proofend; uniqueness for b1, b2 being Element of F holds ( ( ex p being Element of S st ( not a _|_ & not x _|_ ) & ( for q being Element of S st not a _|_ & not x _|_ holds b1 = ((ProJ (a,b,q)) * (ProJ (q,a,x))) * (ProJ (x,q,y)) ) & ( for q being Element of S st not a _|_ & not x _|_ holds b2 = ((ProJ (a,b,q)) * (ProJ (q,a,x))) * (ProJ (x,q,y)) ) implies b1 = b2 ) & ( ( for p being Element of S holds ( a _|_ or x _|_ ) ) & b1 = 0. F & b2 = 0. F implies b1 = b2 ) ) proofend; consistency for b1 being Element of F holds verum ; end; :: deftheorem Def3 defines PProJ ORTSP_1:def_3_:_ for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for x, y, a, b being Element of S st not a _|_ holds for b7 being Element of F holds ( ( ex p being Element of S st ( not a _|_ & not x _|_ ) implies ( b7 = PProJ (a,b,x,y) iff for q being Element of S st not a _|_ & not x _|_ holds b7 = ((ProJ (a,b,q)) * (ProJ (q,a,x))) * (ProJ (x,q,y)) ) ) & ( ( for p being Element of S holds ( a _|_ or x _|_ ) ) implies ( b7 = PProJ (a,b,x,y) iff b7 = 0. F ) ) ); theorem Th28: :: ORTSP_1:28 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x, y being Element of S st not a _|_ & x = 0. S holds PProJ (a,b,x,y) = 0. F proofend; theorem Th29: :: ORTSP_1:29 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x, y being Element of S st not a _|_ holds ( PProJ (a,b,x,y) = 0. F iff x _|_ ) proofend; theorem :: ORTSP_1:30 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x, y being Element of S st not a _|_ holds PProJ (a,b,x,y) = PProJ (a,b,y,x) proofend; theorem :: ORTSP_1:31 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x, y being Element of S for l being Element of F st not a _|_ holds PProJ (a,b,x,(l * y)) = l * (PProJ (a,b,x,y)) proofend; theorem :: ORTSP_1:32 for F being Field for S being OrtSp of F for b, a, x, y, z being Element of S st not a _|_ holds PProJ (a,b,x,(y + z)) = (PProJ (a,b,x,y)) + (PProJ (a,b,x,z)) proofend;